I was only able to attend the first of two week-long workshops at
the Summerfield Waldorf School in Sebastopol, California, with German
musician, composer, and instrument-maker Manfred Bleffert. The five
days (July 26-31) were surprisingly packed with challenging ideas,
new experiences of intense listening and feeling, and group bonding
through playing music and constructing instruments together.
These 2009 workshops were designed to build on the previous summer’s
work (and included a number of repeat attendees), but also to welcome
newcomers like myself. Among the twelve or so of us, there were several
Waldorf school music teachers, a music therapist, a eurythmist, and
a teacher of Werbeck singing. Participants came from up and down the
west coast, from Canada, Midwestern states, Texas, and, farthest of
all, Nepal. Last summer’s larger groups worked over eighteen
days to construct primarily xylophone-type instruments in iron and
wood as well as pairs of iron rods hanging by fishline (a new kind
of instrument) and gongs. The unique instruments, their tuning, and
the processes of making them have all been worked out over more than
thirty years by Bleffert.
As during the previous summer, this year’s workshops featured
lectures, improvisation exercises in new tonal awareness with the
group of twelve playing and listening to both new and traditional
instruments, and much hands-on experience constructing the instruments.
There were also a of couple drawing exercises and, particularly during
the second week, exercises with the visual arts as a way to develop
a new form of musical graphic notation and compositions. Many bits
of advice for the Waldorf music teachers were also scattered throughout
the course. The real depth of what Manfred was bringing crept up on
me only slowly. By the end, I felt I had acquired a grand new vision
not only of the rich future possibilities for music but also for the
future of humanity.
The first evening Manfred expressed his hope that our work together
might be able to translate something of the being and destiny of America
into music. He referred to both the traditions of the Native Americans
and to the more modern musical innovations of Edgar Varese, John Cage,
Steve Reich, and others. Today humanity has crossed a threshold, and
the European tradition of music-making must change. In contrast to
Europe and Asia, in America we must look to go into the (musical)
future out of will impulses, which can also manifest in music as mathematical
or somewhat mechanical rhythms. That first evening and again later
Manfred played a small concert consisting of a compressed history
of western music played mostly on three glockenspiels composed of
alternating iron and copper bars (combining and linking selections
from Palestrina, Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Debussy, Bartok, and Stravinsky).
We engaged in numerous, ever-changing group-improvisation exercises
that would mark the beginning of each morning and each afternoon,
culminating in a final evening concert attended by local friends.
Fortunately, we were able to use for our exercises the many Bleffert-designed
instruments constructed during last year’s workshop, particularly
the uniquely resonant twelve iron xylophones, each tuned to a single
diatonic (planetary) tone over its multiple, varied-width bars (to
give variation and “breathing” to the sounding of each
pitch). After a couple of exercises with 4 players creating individual
rhythmic ostinato patterns in concert on the carved wooden xylophones,
we briefly began working on bronze finger cymbals with the descending
sequence of four tones (BAED) that Rudolf Steiner called the “TAO”
and gave as “an esoteric exercise” for eurythmists (see
the end of lecture 5 of Eurythmy as Visible Music) –- although
we gradually sounded all four tones together. Steiner says it is necessary
to go back to the ancient civilization of China to understand this
“eurythmy meditation.” In this sequence, said Manfred,
we can experience something through which our human being finds or
comes to itself in a healthy way as well as something of the original
incarnation process of music as a gift of the gods to humanity (echoing
a November 16,1905, statement by Steiner).
Manfred repeatedly worked with an ancient Chinese legend describing
how the heavenly order of the twelve tones originally was given to
human beings through the singing of two heavenly phoenixes (or firebirds,
male and female). Manfred explained the generation of the twelve ancient
Chinese pentatonic scales using a diagram of sequential alternating
falling fifths (from female to male) and rising fourths (from male
to female). Manfred stated that in the alternating pattern of singing
of the male and female phoenixes was an alternation of types of tones,
equivalent to the differentiation between the qualities of male and
female, yin and yang, and, in substances, iron and copper –
the very materials we would be working with. (The Chinese name for
the phoenix, a heavenly messenger who is different from the phoenix
of Middle Eastern and Greek lore, is the compound term FèngHuáng,
with Fèng meaning male, yang, and solar and Huáng meaning
female, yin, and lunar.)
We engaged in a number of experiential observations of the varying
natures of iron and copper (metals of Mars and Venus), including improvisation
exercises contrasting playing of copper gongs and finger cymbals in
an inner circle with an outer circle playing iron glockenspiels as
well as concentrated listening exercises comparing the fading tonal
resonance of struck copper and iron bars. In the latter we noticed
that the “harder” tone from the iron bar seemed to continue
straight outward, while the “softer” copper tone seemed
more rounded and warm in its tonal radiance. The natural musical interval
between an iron and copper bar of the same size turned out to be a
fourth – “the interval that lives between men and women,”
commented Manfred. Manfred also related this duality to the major
and minor scales, to the black and white keys of the piano, and to
a similar kind of division of the twelve tones in the music of Debussy
and Bartok.
Historically, everyone eventually came to be making his or her own
music, but with the end of Kali Yuga in 1899 we must now find the
way to lift music again up to the heavenly sphere. Each people of
the world has carried over a musical tradition from this ancient time,
and today many musicians are experimenting multiculturally with combining
aspects of these traditions (e.g, playing a digeradoo with a violin
and saxophone) to attempt to create a new direction forward in music.
However, today we are coming to the end of these ancient inspirations
for humanity, and something really new is needed.
In between Manfred’s short talks on more theoretical and historical
aspects and our various musical improvisation exercises, we spent
many hours each day in diligent and sometimes tiring labor constructing
our copper and iron glockenspiels, copper gongs, and, in my case,
a large wooden xylophone. This involved cutting the various metals
to shape and seemingly endless hammering on anvils to temper and form
them. We could clearly hear the difference in quality between the
rounded, warmly resonant tone of a metal bar that had been hammered
and the flat, rapidly fading tone of one that had not. Then there
was the final process of tuning the instruments. Manfred trained us
to listen to the full range of the sounding of a tone: how it arises,
how it fades away, and what it leaves behind in the silence. Most
of the learning we engaged in during the workshop was of an experiential
or phenomenological nature. We learned that our very hearing activity
affects the tones and can open them up for something new. We learned
that we Americans must divide our will forces into a part that acts
and experiences as well as a part that consciously observes.
One of our often repeated exercises during the first half of the
week involved playing (“incarnating from above”) the four
descending tones of the TAO, normally on the iron glockenspiels arranged
in a large circle. The first tone continued sounding, even as each
additional tones was added to the continuously sounding mix. Then
we tried adding to that a fifth, lower note that had to be found spontaneously
by a group of more traditional instruments: a cello, bass flute, guitar,
and xylophone. This established a kind of ground or lowest incarnation
point. Then we played the same tones as a rising sequence and this
time the traditional instruments had to find a new tone (or tone cluster)
above the final note of the TAO, a note of the future. Although these
additional tones above and below were often a dissonant sounding of
multiple instruments, in this context they were full of “future
feeling” and often quite beautiful or moving in an unfamiliar
way.
Soon we expanded these TAO exercises to several variations of playing
on the iron glockenspiels the seven tones of the diatonic (planetary)
scale, both descending and ascending, but adding the “extra”
improvised or “discovered” tones/tone clusters above and
below. Repeatedly, we used different sequences of tones, improvised
each time, not to create a linear melody but to build up a “community”
or “tower” of tones as the seven “voices”
(some doubled) felt the way to sound together. As each tone arose
with its own “sonic gesture” on the uniquely resonant
Bleffert instruments, it was as if a new spiritual presence had joined
the tonal community, each of which changed the quality of the whole.
Then gradually the tones faded out into silence, one by one. All of
these mostly simple exercises were both fun music-making and concentrated
group spiritual research.
Manfred encouraged us to try to feel the future coming toward the
present silence, the silence that composer John Cage wrote about and
also spotlighted in his famous 1952 piece “4’33,”
in which the pianist simply sat at the piano for that length of time.
The real tonal system we have today is the silence of the earth. The
earth itself was created out of the heavenly “harmony of the
spheres,” and it can be the prototype for a future development
of the arts (as we had heard with iron and copper). At this point
I want to simply quote Manfred’s eloquent description:
“In the future we will learn from the earth – but not
directly, which is materialism. Rather, human beings must change the
material being of the earth into their own creations. . . . We are
the beings of silence, and out of this silence bring music into this
world. If not, we would be mere imitators, like the animals. Music
is dying in us, and we have to resurrect every tone in us, to take
them out of the great silence and make them living. . . . Feel the
joy of the eternal creation of music coming originally from the heavens.
Feel how the “birth” of each tone changes the world, like
the birth of each new child.”
When I heard Manfred speak this way, it occurred to me that these
words could just as well have been spoken by the late German artist
Joseph Beuys (1921-1986). The second-last night I contributed an evening
slide talk as an introduction to the varied and unusual creative work
of Beuys, mostly inspired by his studies of Rudolf Steiner. Beuys,
too, phenomenologically explored the qualities of different substances
of the earth, but more within an avant-garde visual-arts context than
a musical one. He also was aware that the past traditions in culture
are coming to an end and new ways must be found. This is one explanation
for his unusual work exploring the qualities and expressive potentials
of such mostly untraditional art materials as honey, fat, beeswax,
blood, felt, chocolate, and, yes, also iron and copper – as
well as new forms of visual art arising in the 1960s including performance
art, earth art, and installations. It turned out that Manfred had
been a friend and sometime collaborator with Beuys. Manfred played
a couple of unusual Beuys-related pieces, one from 1963 on a Cagean
prepared piano. I began to realize that just as Beuys sought new visual
images and actions to represent supersensible realities, so Manfred
sought for new aural processes and improvisations (and the instruments
to support them) to represent those same supersensible realities.
And both men especially focused on attentiveness to the qualities
of the substances used.
In addition to a Beuysian turn to the rest of the workshop, there
were numerous other surprises. For example, the final morning Manfred
announced that we were going to gather wood, build fires, and put
the copper and iron bars and gongs we were making into the fire. After
about twenty minutes, we would then put both the heated metals and
the glowing embers into holes we dug in the earth, leaving them there
for three hours before digging them up. This was part of the “curing”
process of making these instruments, and this giving our work over
to fire and earth needed to be accompanied by a wakeful consciousness.
When this was done, the gongs and bars often emerged from the earth
with marvelously multicolored surfaces in striated, marble-like patterns
(see photograph). After this process yet more hammering was required
to brighten a somewhat dulled but also deepened sound the metals had
acquired. Manfred spoke of our entering into the substances we used
and compared all of our work in hammering, playing, listening, and
tuning the metals to different healing “skins” of warmth
we were placing around them (related to the way Beuys used felt and
fat and other means to accentuate the warmth element that he felt
our coldly intellectual society much needed for balance). With our
world growing ever-more electrified and digitalized, it was refreshing
to connect directly with the qualities of specific natural substances.
Manfred’s intensive process of working, transforming, and “warming”
the metals helps to free the tone sounding from them from its heavier,
more material aspects.
A week after this workshop, on Sunday, August 9, Manfred presented
a concert on the pipe-organ in Grace Cathedral in San Francisco. I
was able to go to this concert, where Manfred played three sections
based on quotations from Cage, Beuys, and Steiner that I had sent
him and adding a fourth section (“movement”) based on
Bartok. Grace Cathedral is a huge, stone, Gothic-style structure filled
with stained glass windows and having its organ pipes on four different
walls. In his concert Manfred made full use of the spatial potentials
of tones arising from one end or the other of the cathedral and moving,
crossing, or weaving with tones arising from pipes on the other walls.
Throughout the concert mighty organ tones would rise and radiate outward,
grow ever more internally varied, be joined by new tones, and then
gradually fade away. As had previously occurred to me during some
of our improvisation exercises, I imagined each new tone rising up
as a forceful spiritual presence, joining other lofty spirits at the
original creation. Yet at both the organ concert and the exercises
this did not feel like a “flashback” view into the ancient
past but rather an improvised new birthing, tone by tone, out of the
self-conscious human spirits assembled together.
I realized that, unlike traditional music, one does not experience
Manfred’s music so much in time as in space. Tones build up
personality-like structures and presences and even relationships and
then fade away. This strong spatial, visual quality reminded me of
Steiner’s statements about how in the future music will become
more like the visual arts (and the visual arts become more like music).
With so much emphasis in Manfred’s approach on the richness
and presence of the single tone (almost to that future stage of music
Steiner mentioned as being able to hear a melody within a single tone),
I also wonder a bit whether the essential experience of the interval
between the tones becomes a bit too lost. Yet this is also still there
in a different way in the “community” of tones sounding
together.
I find that the musical work of Manfred Bleffert represents a new
step forward in musical research arising out of anthroposophy and,
moreover, is a work that others are welcome to join. For more information
about future workshopz, consult www.manfred-bleffert.net.